Find your market before you write a single word. Three hours of structured research replaces six months of writing a book that doesn't sell.
Most authors spend 6–12 months writing a book and hope people buy it. You're going to spend three hours researching what people are already buying — then write that book.
The difference is hope-based vs. data-based. You're choosing data.
The framework is four phases. One tool per phase. One deliverable at the end: a positioning brief that tells you exactly how to structure your book before you write a word.
| Phase | What it answers | Tool | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Discovery | What's actually selling in my niche right now? | Perplexity Deep Research | 30 min |
| 2. Verification | Is this data real or hallucinated/stale? | Comet (agentic browser) | 45 min |
| 3. Pattern decoding | What's the formula behind what's working? | Claude Code | 60 min |
| 4. Live ad intelligence | What hooks are converting in paid traffic? | Comet + Facebook Ad Library | 30 min |
In 2026, prompting one chatbot is no longer the move. Perplexity has live web search and citations. Comet (Perplexity's agentic browser) browses websites as you — past the bot blocks. Claude Code excels at structural pattern-finding across large amounts of text. The Facebook Ad Library is a goldmine of what's converting right now in paid. Each phase needs its own tool.
To show you what good output looks like, here's the framework run live on a real niche — gut health, the #1 selling category in healthcare and wellness publishing right now. Replace the keywords with your niche and the output structure is identical.
Tool: Perplexity Deep Research · Why: live web access, citations on every claim, will say "I don't know" instead of hallucinating
You are a book market analyst. I'm writing a book in the
[YOUR NICHE] space.
Find me the 10 books that have the strongest signals of CURRENT
sales momentum (not all-time bestsellers — books moving NOW in 2026).
For each, return:
- Title + author
- Author credentials (MD/PhD/RD/journalist/none)
- Approximate review count (Amazon + Goodreads)
- Year published
- Subtitle (verbatim)
- The author's backend offer (program/course/coaching) if visible
- Any 2026-specific signal (recent press, podcast tour, new edition)
Hard rule: if you cannot find a citation for a data point,
mark it [UNVERIFIED] — do not estimate.
Output as markdown table sorted by review count descending.
| Title | Author | Credentials | Ratings | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gut: The Inside Story | Giulia Enders | MD (in training) | 56,949 | 2014 (new ed. 2026) |
| How Not to Die | Michael Greger | MD | 51,110 | 2015 |
| Wheat Belly | William Davis | MD (cardiologist) | 31,498 | 2011 |
| Grain Brain | David Perlmutter | MD (neurologist) | 24,800 | 2013 |
| Fiber Fueled | Will Bulsiewicz | MD (gastroenterologist) | 12,675 | 2020 |
| The Mind-Gut Connection | Emeran Mayer | MD (UCLA) | 9,704 | 2015 |
| Brain Maker | David Perlmutter | MD | 9,198 | 2015 |
| Spoon-Fed | Tim Spector | MD / Professor | 5,855 | 2020 |
| The Clever Guts Diet | Michael Mosley | MD | 5,675 | 2017 |
| Super Gut | William Davis | MD | 3,482 | 2022 |
Tool: Comet (Perplexity's agentic browser) · Why: Amazon and Goodreads block scrapers. Comet browses as a logged-in user — not a bot.
For each book in the table I'm pasting below, open its Amazon page
and pull these data points TODAY:
- Current Best Seller Rank (overall + category, with timestamp)
- Total review count
- Reviews in the last 30 days (look at recent review dates, count them)
- Most recent review date
- Current price (Kindle + paperback)
- Author's website URL
Flag any book where:
- BSR > 100,000 (= barely selling)
- No reviews in last 60 days (= momentum dead)
- Mark these [STALE] in the output.
Output as markdown table. Add a "Momentum Score" column (1-10)
based on review velocity vs. lifetime average.
Strong current momentum: books with BSR under 50K, fresh reviews in the last 30 days, an active author podcast or new edition, a visible backend offer.
Stable but not breakout: books with steady review velocity but no new media wave.
[STALE] flag: books that show on bestseller listicles but were published 5+ years ago with no new reviews this quarter. Selling once does not mean selling now.
Don't trust the first AI list. Half of "top books in 2026" articles include books published in 2014 with stale review streams. Phase 2 is what separates the books that are selling from the books that used to sell.
Tool: Claude Code (with web access) · Why: best at structural pattern-finding. Feed it 10 book descriptions, subtitles, and cover lines — it finds the formula in minutes.
You are a positioning strategist. I'm pasting in 10 verified
bestselling book listings from the [YOUR NICHE] niche, including:
- Title
- Subtitle
- Author credentials
- Cover description
- Amazon book description (first 200 words)
- Backend offer (if known)
Find the patterns. Specifically:
1. TITLE STRUCTURE — what formats appear repeatedly?
2. SUBTITLE FORMULA — what's the dominant promise structure?
3. THE ONE PROMISE — if each book had to fit on a billboard, what's the single line?
4. AUTHORITY SIGNALS — how is credibility established?
5. BACKEND OFFER STRUCTURE — what's the value ladder behind the book?
6. COMMON METAPHORS — what mental models do they use?
Then identify GAPS:
- What promise is overused (= crowded)?
- What angle is missing (= opportunity)?
- What credentials combo is rare in the top 10 (= differentiator)?
Output as a positioning brief, not a list of facts.
Title structure (3 dominant patterns):
| Pattern | Examples |
|---|---|
| Single-word visceral noun | Gut, Wheat Belly, Super Gut |
| Anti-establishment | The Diet Myth, The Plant Paradox, Missing Microbes |
| Clinical authority | The Mind-Gut Connection, The Microbiome Solution |
Subtitle formula — the dominant pattern is the Triple-Promise List:
[Action verb] [Outcome 1], [Outcome 2], and [Outcome 3]
The triple-promise is so dominant in this niche it's almost mandatory. Always: weight + something internal (gut, mood, energy) + something aspirational (longevity, freedom).
The one promise (billboard test): Every winning gut book reduces to "Fix your gut → fix everything." The "everything" varies — weight, mood, fatigue, brain fog, autoimmune — but the architecture is identical.
Authority signals: 8 of the 10 top books are authored by an MD, PhD, or Professor. The two exceptions are scientists writing as journalists. You need credentials or a credentialed co-author. No exceptions in the top 10.
Backend offer structure — the value ladder:
Every successful author in this space runs the same ladder:
Examples in this niche:
The book is the lead magnet. The money is downstream. If you write a book without designing the value ladder behind it, you'll leave 95% of the revenue on the table.
Crowded angles (avoid head-to-head):
Missing in the top 10 (the open lanes):
If your real-world story matches one of these missing angles, you have an opening that the current top 10 cannot reach.
Tool: Comet + Facebook Ad Library · Why: longevity = conversion. Ads running 90+ days are working. Ads running 5 days are tests.
Open the Facebook Ad Library at facebook.com/ads/library.
Search keyword: [niche keyword — e.g., "gut health", "bloating"]
Filter: Active ads only.
For each advertiser running 5+ ads OR ads that have been
running 90+ days:
- Take a screenshot of the longest-running ad
- Note: advertiser, hook (first 5 words), ad format
(image / VSL / UGC), CTA
Bring me the top 10. I'm looking for what's CONVERTING
(longevity = converting in paid traffic).
Hook patterns running 90+ days:
Format patterns:
Facebook allows symptom language ("bloating", "fatigue", "brain fog") but blocks condition language ("IBS", "Crohn's", "leaky gut"). Top-performing ads stay symptom-side. Know this before you spend a dollar.
The replay-ability rule: A working hook in this niche can run for years with a strong authority figure on camera. Don't reinvent — refine.